lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Exynos : Add support for Exynos random number generator
On 2012년 06월 21일 12:12, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 06/20/12 19:39, jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com wrote:
>>
>>>> +static int exynos_init(struct hwrng *rng)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct exynos_rng *exynos_rng = container_of(rng,
>>>> + struct exynos_rng, rng);
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> + u32 PRND_SEED[5];
>>>> +
>>>> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(exynos_rng->dev);
>>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(exynos_rng->dev);
>>> This looks very odd. Why are you calling pm_runtime_put_noidle()?
>>>
>>
>> When this callback function is called, the status of power state is
>> 'suspended' and use_count is 1. To perform pm_runtime_get_sync()
>> correctly, it requires to have 'suspended' status and use_count is 0.
>> Thus i force to decrease use_count only with using
>> pm_runtime_put_noidle. I know it looks odd, but i couldn't find better
>> way. Otherwise it can use clk_enable() directly, but i think that it
>> isn't good neither.
>
> Is the device suspended initially at probe? If so can you set the state
> of the device to suspended?
>


Yes, it suspended already at the initial of probing. But i can't get
your point, you want to me to make device suspended?

>>
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + struct exynos_rng *exynos_rng;
>>>> + struct resource *res;
>>>> +
>>>> + exynos_rng = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct exynos_rng),
>>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!exynos_rng)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + exynos_rng->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> + exynos_rng->rng.name = "exynos";
>>>> + exynos_rng->rng.init = exynos_init;
>>>> + exynos_rng->rng.read = exynos_read;
>>>> + exynos_rng->clk = clk_get(NULL, "secss");
>>> Can you please pass &pdev->dev to clk_get()?
>>>
>>
>> But, this clock is not only used in PRNG. Should i put it in?
>
> Why would that matter? I'm not familiar with the samsung clock
> implementation but I would assume that something like clkdev is being
> used. Ideally you would have one lookup entry per struct device that
> uses this clock and then tie each lookup entry to the same clock. This
> allows you to support multiple instances of the same device in a generic
> way (e.g. two rng devices that use different clocks but from the driver
> perspective they have the same name 'secss').
>


Okay, I see. I'll apply it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-22 04:21    [W:0.061 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site