lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Date
> Then the driver should NEVER have been submitted without the
> required infrastructure in place first.

This particular driver don't use the clk framework at the moment. I put
that lines about clk to try to be generic as possibile, but I see that I
made a mistake: I'm sorry. An alternative solution to HAVE_CLK
dependency can be: remove the clk_* lines because actualy nobody use
them. In the future, if our c_can migrate to clk and our clk framework
is accepted in the kernel, we can re-add the clk_* lines.


--
Federico Vaga


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-20 16:21    [W:0.123 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site