lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward
From
Hi Hillf,

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>>
>> Hang at same place?
>>
> And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
>
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c        Sat Jun  2 17:30:28 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c        Thu Jun  7 20:58:36 2012
> @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
>                /* Update our root-domain */
>                grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
>                if (rq->rd) {
> -                       BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
> +                       BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>
>                        set_rq_online(rq);
>                }
> --

Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-17 13:21    [W:0.077 / U:0.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site