Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0700 | Subject | Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward | From | Emmanuel Benisty <> |
| |
Hi Hillf,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Emmanuel >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there. >>> >> Hang at same place? >> > And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please. > > > --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat Jun 2 17:30:28 2012 > +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Thu Jun 7 20:58:36 2012 > @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf > /* Update our root-domain */ > grq_lock_irqsave(&flags); > if (rq->rd) { > - BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span)); > + BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span)); > > set_rq_online(rq); > } > --
Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |