Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:37:29 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5] slab/mempolicy: always use local policy from interrupt context | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:11 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, David Rientjes wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, David Mackey wrote: >> >> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c >> > index f15c1b2..cb0b230 100644 >> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c >> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c >> > @@ -1602,8 +1602,14 @@ static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy) >> > * task can change it's policy. The system default policy requires no >> > * such protection. >> > */ >> > -unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy) >> > +unsigned slab_node(void) >> > { >> > + struct mempolicy *policy; >> > + >> > + if (in_interrupt()) >> > + return numa_node_id(); >> > + >> > + policy = current->mempolicy; >> > if (!policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL) >> > return numa_node_id(); >> > >> >> Should probably be numa_mem_id() in both these cases for >> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, but it won't cause a problem in this form >> either. >> >> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> >> > > Still missing from linux-next, who's going to pick this up?
I'm going to pick it up. I've been postponing merging it until dust has settled from Christoph's "common slab" patch series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |