Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:11:45 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/14] mfd: Initialise the DB8500 PRCMU driver at core_initcall time |
| |
On 11/06/12 22:01, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Lee Jones<lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Now the AB8500 has its own IRQ domain > > But that does not appear until patch 8 in this series? Are the patches in > the wrong order? Or does this need rewording?
The patches are in the correct order. This needs to be done _before_ we provide the AB8500 with its own domain. I guess the line should reference future tense. We are only talking two patches in the future, is it that important? I will change the wording slightly if it is.
>> it needs to be initialised earlier >> in the boot sequence. As the AB8500 relies on the DB8500 PRCMU we need to >> reflect this change for the PRCMU driver too. > > Hm what shall we do when we run out of initlevels? I think this was the > kind of thing that deferred probe should solve. Usually changing this kind > of thing has side effects so I'm a bit hesitant.
Nothing seems to be broken by it. My Snowball still comes up and everything that worked before continues to do so. How would you like me to take this forward?
-- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |