[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Track minimum microcode revision globally v2
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:09:25PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >Ok, is it only me or is this boot_min_microcode superfluous?
> >IOW, you can only use boot_cpu_data.microcode instead and drop
> >boot_min_microcode.
> boot_cpu_data.microcode contains a copy of the original microcode,
> so we couldn't detect the boot cpu case. In theory could hard code
> CPU #0 is boot cpu or so,
> but I prefer to track it with the separate variable.

Ok, this begs the next question then: why do we need to say that some AP
has a lower ucode version than the BSP?


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-13 04:41    [W:0.088 / U:5.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site