Messages in this thread | | | From | Mike Frysinger <> | Subject | Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] blackfin: how is the I-pipe code supposed to be built? | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:31:12 -0400 |
| |
On Monday 11 June 2012 15:44:50 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 23:05 -0400, Zhang, Sonic wrote: > > The IPIPE patch is part of the ADEOS real time kernel patch. The > > common part of this patch hasn't been merged into mainline by the > > maintainer Philippe Gerum, although the Blackfin architecture part > > was. The relative Kbuild support and Kconfig symbols are defined in > > the ADOES common patch. > > What's the point of having code in the mainline tree, for over three > years, without any Kbuild or Kconfig support?
because the Blackfin team cares about keeping ADEOS active throughout the rewrites/updates of core code. it isn't hurting keeping the code in the arch/blackfin/ tree, and we're ok with any overhead it implies for the team. -mike [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |