Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net: socket: fixed coding style issues. | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:53:23 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 14:17 +0100, Matthew Shaw wrote: > Fixed an instance where brances are used but not needed, and some lines > in the comments and code that exceed the 80 character limit. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Shaw <shaw500@gmail.com> > --- > net/socket.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c > index 6e0ccc0..2133040 100644 > --- a/net/socket.c > +++ b/net/socket.c > @@ -8,48 +8,48 @@ > * Fred N. van Kempen, <waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG> > * > * Fixes: > - * Anonymous : NOTSOCK/BADF cleanup. Error fix in > - * shutdown() > - * Alan Cox : verify_area() fixes > - * Alan Cox : Removed DDI > - * Jonathan Kamens : SOCK_DGRAM reconnect bug [...]
I would question whether such lists of bug fixes are worth keeping at all. The names should probably be kept as credits, but the details are ancient history now.
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
| |