Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:42:40 +0800 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect Device Tree |
| |
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 11/06/12 11:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Suppose you have two devices of the same type with an array of name > >based regulators, meaning the nodes with constraints have to have a > >particular name in order to be matched to the regulator. How would a > >consumer reference a node to specify a supply?
> some-regulators { > compatible = "protect_me_from_similarly_named_regulators"; > > regulator_node_name_reg: regulator_node_name { > <blah> > }; > };
> [supply_name]-supply = <®ulator_node_name>;
I'm not 100% sure you read what I wrote above or in all the previous mails about having two devices of the same type? The case where we have only one regulator of a given type obviously works otherwise people would have noticed, the problem starts when you have two of the same regulator device down. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |