Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:37:03 +1000 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree |
| |
Hi Tyler,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:41:55 -0700 Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> wrote: > > On 2012-05-31 14:41:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > I am just wondering about the fate of the ecryptfs tree. The most recent > > commit to that tree is dated Feb 11 and seems to have been included in > > Linus' tree as a different commit. > > My next branch has become stale. Sorry about that! I haven't been doing > much development on the kernel side in the last couple months. That will > soon change, as I have a few bug fixes in the works and I know of a > contribution or two that should surface shortly.
Thanks for that.
> In the meantime, I've just pushed the HEAD of Linus' tree to my next > branch to clean things up.
Excellent.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |