lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Disable ASPM L1 on 82574
On 23/04/2012 22:29, Chris Boot wrote:
> ASPM on the 82574 causes trouble. Currently the driver disables L0s for
> this NIC but only disables L1 if the MTU is >1500. This patch simply
> causes L1 to be disabled regardless of the MTU setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
> Cc: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>
> Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/19/362
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> index b3fdc69..c6d95f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
> @@ -2061,8 +2061,9 @@ const struct e1000_info e1000_82574_info = {
> | FLAG_HAS_SMART_POWER_DOWN
> | FLAG_HAS_AMT
> | FLAG_HAS_CTRLEXT_ON_LOAD,
> - .flags2 = FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG
> + .flags2 = FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG
> | FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S
> + | FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1
> | FLAG2_NO_DISABLE_RX,
> .pba = 32,
> .max_hw_frame_size = DEFAULT_JUMBO,

Now that this patch is in master (d4a4206e) and has presumably been
widely tested, what's the possibility of it making it into stable? I
really should have included a CC to stable when I sent it...

This patch should probably also be accompanied with 59aed952 (e1000e:
Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement) on top, to
remove a special case that's no longer required once this is applied.

Thanks,
Chris

--
Chris Boot
bootc@bootc.net



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-01 23:41    [W:0.043 / U:1.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site