lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] open(2): document O_PATH
    On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:34:35PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

    > I looked at dnotify_flush, they remove markers on an inode.
    > But then it also checks for filp to match. So I am not sure
    > whether skipping dnotify_flush for O_PATH descriptor have any impact. We
    > can't use O_PATH descriptor for dnotify fcntl any way. So in
    > dnotify_flush we will not match the filp.
    >
    > Viro,
    >
    > Any reason why we skip dnotify_flush ?

    See your last sentence above - why bother finding the mark, scanning the
    list, etc. when we know that there won't be any matches?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-03 16:42    [W:0.022 / U:61.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site