[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] open(2): document O_PATH
    On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:34:35PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

    > I looked at dnotify_flush, they remove markers on an inode.
    > But then it also checks for filp to match. So I am not sure
    > whether skipping dnotify_flush for O_PATH descriptor have any impact. We
    > can't use O_PATH descriptor for dnotify fcntl any way. So in
    > dnotify_flush we will not match the filp.
    > Viro,
    > Any reason why we skip dnotify_flush ?

    See your last sentence above - why bother finding the mark, scanning the
    list, etc. when we know that there won't be any matches?

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-03 16:42    [W:0.020 / U:24.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site