[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] sched: make callers check lock contention for cond_resched_lock()
    On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 21:22 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
    > Although the real use case is out of this RFC patch, we are now discussing
    > a case in which we may hold a spin_lock for long time, ms order, depending
    > on workload; and in that case, other threads -- VCPU threads -- should be
    > given higher priority for that problematic lock.

    Firstly, if you can hold a lock that long, it shouldn't be a spinlock,
    secondly why isn't TIF_RESCHED being set if its running that long? That
    should still make cond_resched_lock() break.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-03 14:41    [W:0.022 / U:2.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site