Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Yong Zhang <> | Subject | [RFC PATCH 02/10] mn10300: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock()/ipi_call_unlock() | Date | Tue, 29 May 2012 15:15:57 +0800 |
| |
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>
1) call_function.lock used in smp_call_function_many() is just to protect call_function.queue and &data->refs, cpu_online_mask is outside of the lock. And it's not necessary to protect cpu_online_mask, because data->cpumask is pre-calculate and even if a cpu is brougt up when calling arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), it's harmless because validation test in generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() will take care of it.
2) For cpu down issue, stop_machine() will guarantee that no concurrent smp_call_fuction() is processing.
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com> Cc: linux-am33-list@redhat.com --- arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c index 090d35d..e62c223 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/smp.c @@ -876,9 +876,7 @@ static void __init smp_online(void) notify_cpu_starting(cpu); - ipi_call_lock(); set_cpu_online(cpu, true); - ipi_call_unlock(); local_irq_enable(); } -- 1.7.5.4
| |