Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 May 2012 22:30:05 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture. |
| |
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:33:37PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: > From: Vincent Sanders <vince@collabora.co.uk> > > The constructor symbol name is different between platforms. Allow this > to be selected by configuration and set suitable default values. > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Sanders <vincent.sanders@collabora.co.uk> > --- > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 6 +++--- > init/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > kernel/module.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h > index 8aeadf6..fd34808 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h > @@ -471,9 +471,9 @@ > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS > -#define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \ > - VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_start) = .; \ > - *(.ctors) \ > +#define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \ > + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_start) = .; \ > + *(CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS_NAME) \ > VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_end) = .;
What is wrong with adding both "standard" names for ctors uncnditionally? Like this: > *(.ctors) \ > + *(.init_array) \
Sam
| |