Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 May 2012 20:08:11 +0800 | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH 5/26]Rotary Interactivity Favor Scheduler Version 3(Brain-Eating) Update. | From | Chen <> |
| |
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Chen <hi3766691@gmail.com> wrote: > This is not the regular patch!The regular one is on > http://rifs-scheduler.googlecode.com > > 在 2012-5-28 下午7:39,"Heinz Diehl" <htd@fancy-poultry.org>写道: > >> On 28.05.2012, Chen wrote: >> >> > This is the patch >> >> What you posted is a patch on the BFS-4.20 patch (by Con Kolivas) >> itself, and not a patch against an actual kernel tree. The output >> has a format which is totally unreadable and disgusting, >> and I can't apply it without tinkering with BFS first, >> (which is designed for 3.3.x and needs a merge into 3.4.0 on top of that) >> >> Could you please provide a clean patch which is based on one of the >> current trees? >> >> Besides, it seems to me that you are trying to reinvent the wheel >> using a lot of pieces of Con's -ck patch.. >> >> Thanks, >> Heinz. >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This is a diff between bfs and rifs actually. Also RIFS and BFS are different scheduler. Former one use the algorithm I 've invented(O(1) implementation ), latter one use EEVDF(O(n) implementation) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |