[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] async: introduce 'async_domain' type
    On 5/25/2012 12:51 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
    > On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 00:50 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
    >> This is in preparation for teaching async_synchronize_full() to sync all
    >> pending async work, and not just on the async_running domain. This
    >> conversion is functionally equivalent, just embedding the existing list
    >> in a new async_domain type.
    > This looks good, but I want Arjan and others who invented the async code
    > to speed up boot to comment on all of this. What was the intention of
    > async_synchronize_full() and if it wasn't to synchronise all domains,
    > should we fix the documentation and add a new primitive to do that,
    > since boot clearly assumes the all domains behaviour.

    it was not what was intended originally (the domains were supposed to be
    completely independent beasts), however I can see that this is confusing
    and even undesired, so I am ok with the change.
    Ideally we get a way to have an async domain opt out of the global sync,
    but until I get an actual user of that into mainline, don't worry about it.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-25 15:41    [W:0.023 / U:20.616 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site