Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 May 2012 11:01:26 +0200 | From | Martin <> | Subject | Re: BFS 420: cleanup in tick handling |
| |
On 05/19/2012 09:30 AM, Hillf Danton wrote: > The cpu on stack is not needed, so remove it. > > --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Mon May 14 20:50:38 2012 > +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat May 19 15:18:24 2012 > @@ -2822,8 +2822,7 @@ void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu); > */ > void scheduler_tick(void) > { > - int cpu __maybe_unused = smp_processor_id(); > - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); > + struct rq *rq = this_rq(); > > sched_clock_tick(); > /* grq lock not grabbed, so only update rq clock */ > -- > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hillf, I noticed you posting a few patches to BFS recently. Just wanted to make you aware that there is a certain erm communication issue between the kernel maintainers and the author of BFS. Since he is busy in real life you should contact him directly or cc him. See tail -1 Documentation/scheduler/sched-BFS.txt for email.
| |