Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: (POWER) Replace pseries_notify_cpuidle_add call with a elegant notifier to fix lockdep problem in start_secondary | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Mon, 21 May 2012 10:49:38 +1000 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:47 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Any reason why you don't do cpuidle_disable_device() when the > CPU is going offline and cpuidle_enable_device() when it's coming > back ? > > I'm applying the patch for now since it fixes a real problem but > if the above makes sense, please send a followup fix.
No I'm not ... it's damaged in some odd ways (some whitespace missing here or there among others). Please resend a fixed one.
Cheers, Ben.
| |