[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 02/19] PCI: introduce recursive rwsem to serialize PCI hotplug operations
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:25:21PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2012-5-2 13:00, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:16:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >>From: Jiang Liu<>
> >>
> >>There are multiple ways to trigger PCI hotplug requests concurrently,
> >>such as:
> >>1. Sysfs interfaces exported by the PCI core subsystem
> >>2. Sysfs interfaces exported by the PCI hotplug subsystem
> >>3. PCI hotplug events triggered by PCI Hotplug Controllers
> >>4. ACPI hotplug events for PCI host bridges
> >>5. Driver binding/unbinding events
> >>
> >>The PCI core subsystem doesn't support concurrent hotplug operations yet,
> >>so all PCI hotplug requests should be globally serialized. This patch
> >>introduces several new interfaces to serialize PCI hotplug operations.
> >>
> >>pci_hotplug_try_enter(): try to acquire write lock
> >
> >Ick, no, why would you ever want to do that?
> >
> >>pci_hotplug_enter(): acquire write lock
> >>pci_hotplug_exit(): release write lock
> >>pci_hotplug_disable(): acquire read lock
> >>pci_hotplug_enable(): release read lock
> >
> >No, the pci hotplug core should not need a rwsem, just a simple lock, if
> >that:
> > pci_hotplug_lock()
> > pci_hotplug_unlock()
> >and that's it.
> >
> >Really you should not need these functions, the pci hotplug core should
> >handle it for you, and the drivers should not care at all. That's the
> >"proper" way to fix this up, serialize stuff within the pci core, not
> >the individual drivers.
> >
> >>Today we have reproduced the issue on a real platform by using
> >>acpiphp driver. It's an IA64 platform running Suse 11SP1 (official
> >> kernel). The test script is:
> >>
> >>This issue could be reproduced on an IA64 platform with Suse 11SP1
> >>(official kernel) and acpiphp driver.
> >
> >You do realize just how old that kernel is right? Please don't assume
> >that this kernel version is relevant to us all these years later.
> This could be reproduced with latest kernel too, such as 3.3. We
> use because the all 3.x series kernels can't boot on
> our IA64 platform due to an issue in scheduler. We have reproduced
> similar issue on x86 platforms with 3.x kernels.

That's wonderful, and is relevant, unlike what you originally wrote.

Please always write relevant changelog comments, otherwise they are...

greg k-h

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-03 00:01    [W:0.039 / U:4.344 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site