[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] do not use s_dirt in ext4
Hi Ted,

the merge window is about to open and I am getting worried about this
patch-set - I won't have time to fix it if you indicate an issue...

On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> This patch-set makes ext4 independent of the VFS superblock management
> services. Namely, ext4 does not require to register the 'write_super()' VFS
> call-back.
> The reason of this exercises is to get rid of the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread
> which wakes up every 5 seconds (by default) even if all superblocks are clean.
> This is wasteful from power management POW (unnecessary wake-ups).
> Version 1 of this patch-set can be found here:
> Changes between v1 and v2.
> * Rake different strategy - instead of pushing 's_dirt' down "as-is" and
> emulating old behavior, we now just submit the superblock for writing
> straight away, either via the journal or directly. Thank to Jan Kara
> for helping with this.
> * Ted picked some of the patches already, which made this series shorter
> - thanks!
> * This time I've tested the changes using xfstests.
> * Rebased to 3.4-rc1.
> Note: Ted, you merged the "mm: export dirty_writeback_interval", but it looks
> like we won't need this for ext[23]. However, for other file-systems we will
> need this change.
> Thanks,
> Artem.

Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-18 13:01    [W:0.134 / U:3.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site