lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2
From
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Do you guys have any preferences how to merge this?
>> >> >
>> >> > Can I include it together with the EMEV2 SoC bits perhaps? That may be
>> >> > easy so we can keep track of the platform data header file dependency.
>> >>
>> >> For ux500 I made a special "gpio and pins" branch and sent through ARM SoC.
>> >
>> > The problem is we have a patch depending on the $subject one in the EMEV2
>> > series and it would be better to keep them both together if that's not
>> > a big deal.
>>
>> Dependencies are fine, as long as they are not circular. You can
>> either pull in the gpio/pins branch into the EMEV2 branch, or base it
>> on it.
>
> I guess I'll try to merge the gpio/pins into the EMEV2 branch.

By the way, I should have mentioned that if the dependencies are only
for building and not for context when applying patches, then it's
sufficient to let us know in the pull request so we merge the branches
in the right order when sending to Linus (so we maintain
bisectability).


-Olof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-17 01:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean