Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2 | Date | Thu, 17 May 2012 00:37:34 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Do you guys have any preferences how to merge this? > >> > > >> > Can I include it together with the EMEV2 SoC bits perhaps? That may be > >> > easy so we can keep track of the platform data header file dependency. > >> > >> For ux500 I made a special "gpio and pins" branch and sent through ARM SoC. > > > > The problem is we have a patch depending on the $subject one in the EMEV2 > > series and it would be better to keep them both together if that's not > > a big deal. > > Dependencies are fine, as long as they are not circular. You can > either pull in the gpio/pins branch into the EMEV2 branch, or base it > on it.
I guess I'll try to merge the gpio/pins into the EMEV2 branch.
Thanks, Rafael
| |