[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] slub: fix a memory leak in get_partial_node()
2012/5/16 Greg Kroah-Hartman <>:
>> I read stable_kernel_rules.txt, this article tells me I must note
>> upstream commit ID.
>> Above patch is not included in upstream currently, so I can't find
>> upstream commit ID.
>> Is 'Acked-by from MAINTAINER' sufficient for submitting to stable-kernel?
>> Is below format right for stable submission format?
> No.
> Please read the second item in the list that says: "Procedure for
> submitting patches to the -stable tree" in the file,
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rulest.txt.  It states:
>  - To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
>     Cc:
>   in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
>   the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
>   or subsystem maintainer.
> Does that help?
> thanks,
> greg k-h

Thanks, very helpful.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-16 18:01    [W:0.037 / U:1.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site