lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void *
From
>>> It's not good abstraction.
>>
>> If we want good abstraction, then I don't think 'unsigned long' is
>> either? I mean it will do for the conversion from 'void *'. Perhaps I
>> am being a bit optimistic here - and I am trying to jam in this
>> 'struct zs_handle' in all cases but in reality it needs a more
>> iterative process. So first do 'void *' -> 'unsigned long', and then
>> later on if we can come up with something more nicely that abstracts
>> - then use that?

..snip..
>>> No. What I want is to remove coupling zsallocator's handle with zram/zcache.
>>> They shouldn't know internal of handle and assume it's a pointer.
>>
>> I concur. And hence I was thinking that the 'struct zs_handle *'
>> pointer would work.
>
>
> Do you really hate "unsigned long" as handle?
..snip,,
>> Well, everything changes over time  so putting a stick in the ground
>> and saying 'this must
>> be this way' is not really the best way.
>
>
> Hmm, agree on your above statement but I can't imagine better idea.
>

OK. Lets go with unsigned long. I can prep a patch next week when I am
back from vacation unless somebody beats me to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-16 13:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean