lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work
From
Date
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 14:27 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks.
> > >
> > > Going fine so far, but a more convincing final report tomorrow.
> >
> > Yes, as expected, Peter's patch (+ ,) is good: that load ran four
> > times longer than the longest it managed before without the patch.
> > Just needs Peter's signoff, I think.
>
> Peter, can I take your patch with Hugh's description w/ your SOB?

Yes, sorry, I meant to queue it up the lockdep tree but got distracted
by other stuff.

If you want it, feel tree to take it.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-15 14:01    [W:0.097 / U:4.324 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site