[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: [PATCH v6 07/12] x86/head_32.S: Define start_cpu0
    I just meant: please check if there are any conflicts .. 

    "Yu, Fenghua" <> wrote:

    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: H. Peter Anvin []
    >> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:31 AM
    >> To: Yu, Fenghua; Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Linus Torvalds; Andrew
    >> Morton; Mallick, Asit K; Luck, Tony; Arjan Dan De Ven; Siddha, Suresh
    >> Brown, Len; Srivatssa S. Bhat; Randy Dunlap; Chen Gong; linux-kernel;
    >> linux-pm; x86
    >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] x86/head_32.S: Define start_cpu0
    >> Can you check how this interacts with tip:x86/realmode?
    >When CPU0 is waken up by NMI, it's in protect mode and jumps to
    >start_cpu0() which only sets up stack and goes to initial_code. CPU0
    >wake up doesn't go through trampline and starts from real mode. This is
    >different from waking up AP when AP goes through INIT/STARTUP sequence
    >and starts from real mode.

    Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-11 02:21    [W:0.022 / U:5.352 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site