[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer
    On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
    > Is there any difference in any of the cases in terms of how printk's
    > that are prefixed with KERN_CONT versus a printk that does not have
    > any KERN_* prefix? If so, is there value in keeping KERN_CONT?

    As far as I know, no.

    It is a useful marker to show where prints
    are actually continued.

    #define KERN_CONT ""

    would save a small amount of text.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-10 23:01    [W:0.040 / U:30.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site