On Wed, 9 May 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks.
> 
> Going fine so far, but a more convincing final report tomorrow.

Yes, as expected, Peter's patch (+ ,) is good: that load ran four
times longer than the longest it managed before without the patch.
Just needs Peter's signoff, I think.

Hugh