[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: Add paravirt kvm_flush_tlb_others
On 05/01/2012 06:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > We're now moving the freeing of kvm shadow page tables from using rcu to
> > using an irq-protected scheme like gup_fast(), because of the
> > performance differences. We didn't track it down but I expect the cause
> > is less reuse of cache-hot pages.
> It would be good to understand these things.. just doing things because
> tends to come back and bite you :-)

Agree. Anyway that was only part of the motivation, the other part was
establishing a bound on the number of pages under deferred freeing.

> If its cache behaviour you should be able to clearly see that using perf
> stat.

It's hard to see it clearly because the changes are in the order of 1-2%
in a very noisy benchmark.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-01 18:01    [W:0.107 / U:7.220 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site