Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:02:25 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) |
| |
On 04/06/2012 01:16 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > closefrom(3) written via nextfd(2) loop is reliable and doesn't fail. > closefrom(3) written via /proc/self/fd is reliable and can fail (including ENOMEM). > closefrom(3) written via close(fd++) is unreliable. >
I call shenanigans on this. There is no reason to ENOMEM on the second written using the fdwalk() implementation I already posted, for example.
-hpa
| |