[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets
    Benjamin Herrenschmidt schrieb:
    > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 00:32 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:
    >> *shudder*
    >> Link to another lib for only one function because....
    >> The "Original" says it's an u_int.
    >> But i guess it is unfixable without breaking something, except with ugly code.
    >> Should the padding at least be made explicit in the in-kernel struct?
    >> Did anyone ever tested the 32bit on 64bit compat code (different padding)?
    > Haven't tested no. A quick google pointed to 2 web pages telling people
    > to do the wrong thing and 4 broken programs out there, interestingly in
    > different ways :-) (somebody's doing a reinterpret_cast of one struct
    > into another, somebody does his/her own local redefinition of the
    > struct ... using a ulong !, etc....)


    > I don't see a good way to sort that out other than introducing a new
    > kernel-side structure, change the sockopt number, and support the old
    > one as backward binary compat, but that's gross.

    But a sane way forward?

    BTW, has anyone checked the new syscall filter code for these ... misfortunes?
    I mean before the ABI is set in stone...

    > Cheers,
    > Ben.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-01 03:01    [W:0.024 / U:13.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site