[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets
    Benjamin Herrenschmidt schrieb:
    > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 06:27 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:
    >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt schrieb:
    >>> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    >>>>> Matt's having a look at powerpc
    >>>> Ok, he hasn't so I'll dig a bit.
    >>>> No obvious wrongness (but I'm not very familiar with bpf), though I do
    >>>> have a comment: sk_negative_common() and bpf_slow_path_common() should
    >>>> be made one and single macro which takes the fallback function as an
    >>>> argument.
    >>> Ok, with the compile fix below it seems to work for me:
    >>> (Feel free to fold that into the original patch)
    >> Should i resend the complete patch with the compile fix?
    > Won't hurt...


    > BTW. Any idea about that bpf_program vs. sock_fprog issue I mentioned
    > earlier ?

    No idea, i was going by the old saying:
    "Thou shall not include kernel header, or you will feel the wrath of angry
    kernel gurus."

    > Cheers,
    > Ben.


    The OO-Hype keeps on spinning, C stays.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-30 07:21    [W:0.025 / U:10.496 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site