lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use safe_halt() rather than halt() in acpi_idle_play_deay()
On 04/03/12 12:37, Luck, Tony: <tony.luck@intel.com wrote:
> ACPI code is shared by arch/x86 and arch/ia64. ia64 doesn't provide a plain
> "halt()" function. Use safe_halt() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck<tony.luck@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> E-mail discussion indicated this would be OK. Please check on x86
> before applying.

Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com>

-boris

>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index b3447f6..f3decb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
> while (1) {
>
> if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT)
> - halt();
> + safe_halt();
> else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) {
> inb(cx->address);
> /* See comment in acpi_idle_do_entry() */
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-03 18:55    [W:0.064 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site