[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BUG]memblock: fix overflow of array index
    On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Peter Teoh <> wrote:
    > Thanks for the reply.   Just an educational question:  is it possible
    > to set one-byte per memblock?    And what is the minimum memblock
    > size?

    yes. 1 byte.

    > Even if 2G memblock is a huge number, it still seemed like a bug to me
    > that there is no check on the maximum number (which is 2G) of this
    > variable (assuming signed int).   Software can always purposely push
    > that number up and the system can panic?

    before slab is ready? how?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-26 03:01    [W:0.065 / U:29.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site