Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:52:39 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such |
| |
On 04/25, Al Viro wrote: > > Point... Still, since we are talking about an arbitrary wide window (the > damn thing is waiting for signals to arrive, after all) this doesn't > sound good; > ... > IMO it's > a QoI problem at the very least.
and looks confusing, agreed.
> As for SA_RESTART/!SA_RESTART mixes, if SA_RESTART comes first we should > just take that restart and pretend that the second signal has arrived at > the very beginning of handler, I think.
Yes. My point was, this confuses the user-space developers too. And this case is equally unclear to me wrt should we (at least try to) change this or not.
Oleg.
| |