lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating wakeup sources
On 04/22/2012 02:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl>
>
> Android allows user space to manipulate wakelocks using two
> sysfs file located in /sys/power/, wake_lock and wake_unlock.
> Writing a wakelock name and optionally a timeout to the wake_lock
> file causes the wakelock whose name was written to be acquired (it
> is created before is necessary), optionally with the given timeout.
> Writing the name of a wakelock to wake_unlock causes that wakelock
> to be released.
>
> Implement an analogous interface for user space using wakeup sources.
> Add the /sys/power/wake_lock and /sys/power/wake_unlock files
> allowing user space to create, activate and deactivate wakeup
> sources, such that writing a name and optionally a timeout to
> wake_lock causes the wakeup source of that name to be activated,
> optionally with the given timeout. If that wakeup source doesn't
> exist, it will be created and then activated. Writing a name to
> wake_unlock causes the wakeup source of that name, if there is one,
> to be deactivated. Wakeup sources created with the help of
> wake_lock that haven't been used for more than 5 minutes are garbage
> collected and destroyed. Moreover, there can be only WL_NUMBER_LIMIT
> wakeup sources created with the help of wake_lock present at a time.
>
> The data type used to track wakeup sources created by user space is
> called "struct wakelock" to indicate the origins of this feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
One small bug. In wakelock_lookup_add, you're assigning parent after
you assign node, so at loop exit the parent might be null.
This resulted in some strange cases where I'd add two wakelocks and
everything would be fine, but then adding the third would cause the
first two to get lost.

The following patch seems to fix it.

thanks
-john

diff --git a/kernel/power/wakelock.c b/kernel/power/wakelock.c
index 2f99f02..f950cc2 100644
--- a/kernel/power/wakelock.c
+++ b/kernel/power/wakelock.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static struct wakelock *wakelock_lookup_add(const char *name, size_t len,
while (*node) {
int diff;

+ parent = *node;
wl = rb_entry(*node, struct wakelock, node);
diff = strncmp(name, wl->name, len);
if (diff == 0) {
@@ -82,8 +83,6 @@ static struct wakelock *wakelock_lookup_add(const char *name, size_t len,
node =&(*node)->rb_left;
else
node =&(*node)->rb_right;
-
- parent = *node;
}
if (!add_if_not_found)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-24 03:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans