[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
forgot to mention,

On 04/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Just it seems to me there are to many "details"
> we should discuss to make the filtering reasonable.

And so far we assumed that consumer->filter() is "stable" and never
changes its mind.

Perhaps this is fine, but I am not sure. May we need need some
interface to add/del the task. Probably not, but unregister + register
doesn't look very convenient and can miss a hit.

> Yes, and probably this makes sense for handler_chain(). Although otoh
> I do not really understand what this filter buys us at this point.

But if we change the rules so that ->filter() or ->handler() itself can
return the "please remove this bp from ->mm" then perhaps it makes more
sense for the filtering. Again, not sure.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-23 23:31    [W:0.088 / U:1.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site