lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add mcelog support for xen platform
Date
>> 
>> This driver is not that much different from the APEI bridge to MCE
>> code -
>> it just that instead of reading APEI blob data it reads it from an
>> hypercall.
>
> Let me ask you this: is APEI a virtualization solution of some sort?
>
> No, it is the old windoze RAS crap but I guess Linux has to support it
> now too through BIOS. And x86 vendors will have to support it too.
>
> So it is piece of the firmware we'd have to deal with too.
>
> Now xen is a whole another deal - it is purely a piece of software.

But the role of xen (in fact, including other virtual solution like lguest/kvm) is virtual 'platform', equal to native h/w 'platform'.

>
> Now I keep wondering, why don't you guys simply create your own mcelog
> ring buffer and interface on the userspace tool side instead of
> hooking into lowlevel kernel stuff? I mean, the code is there, you
> simply have to copy it into arch/xen/ or whatever you have there. Why
> do you have to hook into arch/x86/ instead of doing your own stuff?
>
>>> So, my suggestion is to copy the pieces you need and create your
>>> own xen version of /dev/mcelog and add it to dom0 so that there's
>>> no hooking into baremetal code and whenever a dom0 kernel is
>>> running, you can reroute the mcelog userspace tool to read
>>> /dev/xen_mcelog or whatever and not hook into the x86 versions.

That would make distro camp confusing -- i.e. SLES10/11 unifiedly use /dev/mcelog for both native and xen mcelog, w/ almost same dom0 mcelog logic as this patch.

>>>
>>> Because, if you'd hooked into it, just imagine one fine day, when we
>>> remove mcelog support, what screaming the xen people will be doing
>>> when mcelog doesn't work anymore.
>>
>> You would have more screaming from the distro camp about removing
>> /dev/mcelog.
>
> How do you know that? Don't you think that we probably would've talked
> to them already and made preparations for conversion first?

I guess Novell Suse doubt this.

Thanks,
Jinsong--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-23 18:23    [W:0.080 / U:9.532 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site