lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 08/23] don't force return value checking in res_counter_charge_nofail
Date
Since we will succeed with the allocation no matter what, there
isn't the need to use __must_check with it. It can very well
be optional.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
include/linux/res_counter.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
index da81af0..f7621cf 100644
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val);
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
-int __must_check res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
+int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);

/*
--
1.7.7.6


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-21 00:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans