lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 00/18] SMP: Boot and CPU hotplug refactoring - Part 1
    On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

    > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 08:42 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > > I'm still leaning towards restricting kthreadd and any PF_THREAD_BOUND
    > > threads in the root cgroup.
    >
    > I'd definitely agree with restricting those.
    >
    > > I'm not sure about !BOUND kthreads tho.
    > > It doesn't make sense for the most part but there are cases
    > > (e.g. crypto kthreads) which might make some sense.
    > >
    > Agreed as well. There are a few nasty corner cases with unbound
    > workqueues vs allowing cgroups (as how to place new worker threads
    > correctly etc..). Sorting that is a 'fun' next problem.
    >
    > Could we merge the kthreadd/PF_THREAD_BOUND restriction? You've got my
    > ACK and I'm fairly sure tglx will ACK it as well.

    Acked-and-appreciated-by-me


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-20 17:59    [W:6.220 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site