lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm- num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch added to -mm tree
    On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:09:19AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
    > >
    > > I guess maybe it's time to drop one-shot requirement and as result
    > > we can drop MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bit completely,
    >
    > Plus perhaps we can remove this for_each_vma check?
    >
    > > making overall code simplier?
    >
    > Personally I'd certainly prefer this ;)
    >
    > But let me repeat to avoid the confusion. I am fine either way,
    > I am not going to discuss this again unless I see something which
    > looks technically wrong. And the current MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED
    > doesn't look right even if the problem is minor.

    So if there no stong agrues against, lets rip all together --
    and for_each_vma and MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bits, finally making
    code simplier.

    Cyrill


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-20 00:35    [W:2.676 / U:0.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site