Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:12:06 -0700 | From | John Stultz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] clocksource, prevent overflow in clocksource_cyc2ns |
| |
On 04/19/2012 05:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> We should think about the reasons why we have interrupts disabled for >> so much time. Is that really, really necessary ? > I'm not against making the clocksource code more robust, but I don't > want to add crap there just to cope with complete madness elsewhere. >
Very much agreed. -john
| |