[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] s390: mm: rmap: Transfer storage key to struct page under the page lock
    On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
    > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:29:25 +0100
    > Mel Gorman <> wrote:
    > >
    > > In the zap_pte_range() case at least, pte_dirty() is only being checked
    > > for !PageAnon pages so if we took this approach we would miss
    > > PageSwapCache pages. If we added the check then the same problem is hit
    > > and we'd need additional logic there for s390 to drop the PTL, take the
    > > page lock and retry the operation. It'd still be ugly :(
    > Well if x86 can get away with ignoring PageSwapCache pages in zap_pte_range()
    > pages then s390 should be able to get away with it as well, no ?

    When it's zap_pte_range() calling page_remove_rmap(), yes; but that's not
    the only caller of page_remove_rmap(), and I believe there's at least one
    caller which absolutely needs it to do that s390 set_page_dirty() on swap.

    But I don't see any need to be discussing ugly patches for this any more:
    there's a very simple patch which improves the swap path anyway, and if
    deemed advisable, we can also rearrange __add_to_swap_cache() a little.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-18 22:37    [W:0.035 / U:1.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site