[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] clockevents: Leave broadcast device shtudown only if the current device is always running.
    On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:33 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
    > On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 18:27 +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
    >> On Tuesday 10 April 2012 04:11 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
    >>> @@ -575,10 +575,12 @@ void tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot(void)
    >>> unsigned long flags;
    >>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
    >>> +
    >>> + tick_broadcast_device.mode = TICKDEV_MODE_ONESHOT;
    >>> +
    >>> if (cpumask_empty(tick_get_broadcast_mask()))
    >>> goto end;
    >>> - tick_broadcast_device.mode = TICKDEV_MODE_ONESHOT;
    >>> bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
    >>> if (bc)
    >>> tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(bc);
    >> Last time when I tried your patch, some how he ethernet IRQ masked
    >> the issue.
    >> The problem is still as before. If you make a minimal kernel
    >> configuration and possibly have only local timer, broadcast timer
    >> and say console device as CPU wakeup sources, you should hang in
    >> the boot process itself(Assuming CPUIDLE driver is built-in)
    >> The main issue is, you are not letting the one time setup
    >> needed for the broadcast device. Even with above change,
    >> the 'tick_broadcast_device.evtdev' is still in SHUTDOWN
    >> mode and the event handler is pointing to clockevents_handle_noop()
    > On x86, idle driver (like drivers/idle/intel_idle.c:
    > __setup_broadcast_timer()) calls clockevents_notify() with
    > CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON, during which we do
    > tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(). See tick_do_broadcast_on_off() which
    > does this. That should setup the evtdev handler, mode etc.
    > And during the next CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER we program the next
    > broadcast event.
    I see.

    >> So the very first 'CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER' call won't
    >> program the broadcast device with next event and CPU won't wakeup
    >> from low power. if you are lucky and have some other wakeup source,
    >> system will move further and eventually the handler and
    >> mode of the broad-cast device get set correctly.
    > I am confused. Can you elaborate on how on the next spurious wakeup
    > event, broad-cast device handler, mode is set?
    No it doesn't set it. I was wrong in quoting that. The system was
    working because of other wakeup sources. I checked the broadcast
    events and they were not happening.

    > Anyways, can you add CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON/OFF notifications in
    > your idle driver to see if it addresses the problem. That is the correct
    > thing to do here.
    Before your commit 77b0d60c{clockevents: Leave the broadcast device..},
    my idle driver was working without CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON
    notifier. Now it's clear that it was relying on the default
    'tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot()' which was happening during boot.

    And ofcource notifying explicitly with BROADCAST_ON does the
    tick setup. Will update my idle driver accordingly but can
    you please explain me why the proposed patch [1] is not correct
    approach ? It should be also do what you intended to do
    with minimal change, right ?


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-17 10:17    [W:0.026 / U:4.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site