[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
    On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:11:05PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
    > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH <> wrote:
    > > Just one minor correction in this looney email thread:
    > >
    > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
    > >> v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches
    > >> backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was
    > >> no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were
    > >> generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody
    > >> finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed
    > >> in v3.3.2.
    > >
    > > Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the
    > > announcemen and the individual patches. has the large patch
    > > itself if you like that format instead.
    > I don't see it here:
    > If you really want people to try it, why not tag it?

    That would be because I don't keep it in that tree. It is in a quilt
    tree you can find in the stable-queue.git repo, and I have never tagged
    -rc1 releases there. No one has ever asked for it before, so in the
    past 6 years of stable releases, I guess no one ever needed it.

    ketchup and tarballs seem to work well for others, perhaps you can use
    that as well (hint, ketchup on top of the linux-stable tree works just
    fine for testing this.)

    greg k-h
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-16 23:01    [W:0.024 / U:4.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site