lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] perf: generic intel uncore support
From
Date
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 08:48 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 10:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 16:28 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >> On 04/03/2012 06:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 11:11 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Because using per-cpu allocation is inconvenience for PCI uncore device.
> >>>
> >>> What are those, where does one read about them and why?
> >>>
> >> PCI uncore device support was added by patch 4. If using per-cpu pointer,
> >> we have to setup the per-cpu pointer after the PCI driver's probe function
> >> recognizes the uncore device. It means we have to first add the PCI uncore
> >> device to a list, then call a function on all cpus to scan the list, find
> >> the right uncore device and setup the per-cpu pointer.
> >
> > Yeah, I saw that, but it was all completely lacking in where one can
> > find actual detail on that stuff. What parts of the SDM do I read? Is
> > there anything other than the SDM, etc..
> >
> The uncore performance monitoring guide:
>
> http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/design-guides/xeon-e5-2600-uncore-guide.pdf

Thanks,.. ok so I don't see what the problem for PCI is. They're similar
to the MSR based ones except the access is memory-io instead of MSR.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-16 14:13    [W:0.232 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site