Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] fat: mark superblock as dirty less often | From | Artem Bityutskiy <> | Date | Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:08:18 +0300 |
| |
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 19:37 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > > But could you please explain why do we need an extra variable? What is > > the problem with doing all our FAT table changes and then marking the > > FSINFO as dirty? > > Above example may not be proper. I meant please dirty FSINFO only if > necessary. Your patch seems to be dirty even if code didn't change > FSINFO.
Ah, yes, in 'fat_alloc_clusters()' indeed, thanks, I'll fix this.
-- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |