lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net/ipv6/exthdrs.c et al: Optional strict PadN option checking
From
From: Eldad Zack <eldad@fogrefinery.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:31:47 +0200

> That's the way I see it, as was my initial intent. Then I got
> concerned with the possibility that a communication with
> slightly-broken stack implementation (e.g., unsanitized buffers) would
> fail without the user being able to control it at runtime.
> Do you consider this a non-issue?

I think it's a non-issue.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-12 23:41    [W:0.239 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site