Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:35:24 -0400 (EDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net/ipv6/exthdrs.c et al: Optional strict PadN option checking | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Eldad Zack <eldad@fogrefinery.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:31:47 +0200
> That's the way I see it, as was my initial intent. Then I got > concerned with the possibility that a communication with > slightly-broken stack implementation (e.g., unsanitized buffers) would > fail without the user being able to control it at runtime. > Do you consider this a non-issue?
I think it's a non-issue.
| |