lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: boot failures with next-20120411
Date
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 about 16:58:35 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some (not all) of my PowerPC boot tests have failed like this after
> getting into user mode (this one was just after udev started, but others
> are after other processes getting going):
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0xc0000003f9d550
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000001b7f40
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> SMP NR_CPUS=32 NUMA pSeries
> Modules linked in: ehea
> NIP: c0000000001b7f40 LR: c0000000001b7f14 CTR: c0000000000e04f0
> REGS: c0000003f68bf6b0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (3.4.0-rc2-autokern1)
> MSR: 800000000280b032 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 24422424 XER: 20000001
> SOFTE: 1
> CFAR: 000000000000562c
> DAR: 00c0000003f9d550, DSISR: 40000000
> TASK = c0000003f8818000[3192] 'kdump' THREAD: c0000003f68bc000 CPU: 5
> GPR00: 0000000000000000 c0000003f68bf930 c000000000ce1d40 c0000003fe00ec00
> GPR04: 00000000000002d0 0000000000000038 c0000003f8f935e8 c000000000e55280
> GPR08: 0000000000000011 c000000000bcb280 c000000000bcb1e8 000000000028a000
> GPR12: 0000000024422424 c00000000f33bc80 00000fffdd90a770 0000000000081000
> GPR16: c0000003f846c000 000000000de4f7a0 f00000000de4f7a0 0000000000000000
> GPR20: c0000003f8365408 c0000003f8365480 c0000003f8e5d110 0000000000000000
> GPR24: 0000000000000100 c0000003f8365400 c0000000001e5424 00000000000002d0
> GPR28: 0000000000000800 00c0000003f9d550 c000000000c5b718 c0000003fe00ec00
> NIP [c0000000001b7f40] .__kmalloc+0x70/0x230
> LR [c0000000001b7f14] .__kmalloc+0x44/0x230
> Call Trace:
> [c0000003f68bf930] [c0000003f68bf9b0] 0xc0000003f68bf9b0 (unreliable)
> [c0000003f68bf9e0] [c0000000001e5424] .alloc_fdmem+0x24/0x70
> [c0000003f68bfa60] [c0000000001e54f8] .alloc_fdtable+0x88/0x130
> [c0000003f68bfaf0] [c0000000001e5924] .dup_fd+0x384/0x450
> [c0000003f68bfbd0] [c00000000009a310] .copy_process+0x880/0x11d0
> [c0000003f68bfcd0] [c00000000009aee0] .do_fork+0x70/0x400
> [c0000003f68bfdc0] [c0000000000141c4] .sys_clone+0x54/0x70
> [c0000003f68bfe30] [c000000000009aa0] .ppc_clone+0x8/0xc
> Instruction dump:
> 4bff9281 2ba30010 7c7f1b78 40dd00f4 e96d0040 e93f0000 7ce95a14 e9070008
> 7fa9582a 2fbd0000 41de0054 e81f0022 <7f3d002a> 38000000 886d01f2 980d01f2
> ---[ end trace 366fe6c7ced3bfb0 ]---
> This did not happen yesterday. Just wondering if anyone can think of
> anything obvious. Full console log at
> http://ozlabs.org/~sfr/next-20120411.log.bz2

Hi Steven.

The DAR print of the faulting address points out that the address
appears to be shifted right 8 bits. Or more likely the address used
to load the register was decremented by one somewhere (Big Endian).

Although all the registers are multiples of 4 in the first dump,
looking at the later oops in the log would seem to confirm the
address being decremented, eg put_files struct dar of
c0000003f9d547ff in oops #2, and dar 00000000ffffffff in #9, #12,
#14, and #16.

No idea if this is caused by a bad save/restore somewhere or a
decrement of a 32bit number in memory.

Anyone else with a wild -1 on a int, u32 or s32?

milton


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-12 04:47    [W:0.054 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site